The Female Gaze in Music and Advertising: Why Perspective Matters

Perspective is not a vibe. It is decision power. It is who gets to shape what culture looks and sounds like, whose instincts get called "taste," and whose discomfort gets dismissed as overthinking.

The female gaze keeps getting sold like a seasonal aesthetic, but the staffing data does not flirt back. Women are not a minority, yet the industries that score the culture still gatekeep the baton. Brands inherit those defaults every time they reach for the "safe" track, the "credible" voice, the "premium" mix.

In U.S. advertising, women hold about 29% of creative directorroles, a figure widely cited by The 3% Movement (via The One Club, 2022). Ownership is even tighter: Adweek, citing data from the 4A’s, reported in 2022 that less than 1% of ad agencies in North America are owned by women. Recorded music narrows even harder behind the scenes: across the Billboard Hot 100 year-end charts from 2012 to 2023, women accounted for 23.3% of artists, 13.4% of songwriters, and just 3.2% of producers (Annenberg Inclusion Initiative, 2024).

That last number is the tell. You can book the female artist, put her face on the cutdown, and still have the entire sonic world authored by the same old gatekeeping lane. Sound is identity on social, and the people with their hands on the faders shape what "modern" is allowed to sound like.

This is why "representation" is not the whole story. Perspective functions as a production condition: what gets commissioned, what gets funded, what gets protected in edit, and which emotional tones get treated as credible. When leadership stays concentrated, conventions calcify and the work keeps reheating familiar gendered templates.

SHE SOUNDS. treats the female gaze in music as a shift in authorship and emotional permission. Not a filter, not a font, and definitely not a trend report. A redistribution of who gets to set the sound aesthetic and hold it steady under pressure, with rights-led licensing clarity so the work can actually live.

What is the female gaze?

The term "female gaze" is most commonly discussed in film theory as a response to Laura Mulvey's account of the "male gaze" (Mulvey, 1975). Her argument is structural: mainstream cinema historically organizes visual pleasure and narrative authority around a masculine viewing position, with women coded as objects rather than subjects. The core insight holds: style is not neutral, and style carries power.

In practical industry usage, "female gaze" is shorthand for centering women as experiencing subjects with interiority, agency, and emotional specificity, and refusing portrayals that flatten women into a type. It also opens the question the industry loves to dodge: whose feelings count as believable, and whose desire gets framed as the default.

Transferred into music and advertising, the female gaze is less a fixed style than a set of authorial conditions. It shows up in who leads creative direction, who approves the edit, how women are depicted (and by whom), and how emotional tone is built through story, performance, and sonic choices. It also lives in the room: whose interpretation is treated as credible, what kinds of humor are allowed to be sharp, and which references get dismissed as "too much."

Current state: underrepresentation and the sound default

As mentioned, in music, the authorship funnel tightens dramatically behind the scenes. Across Billboard Hot 100 year-end charts from 2012 to 2023, women just 3.2% of producers (Annenberg Inclusion Initiative, 2024). Producers shape the emotional texture: intimacy, weight, pacing, restraint, and impact, and that is why this gap matters.

Advertising has its own funnel. Women are often present at entry and mid levels, while remaining underrepresented in the senior creative and executive roles that hold budgetary and editorial authority (The 3% Movement, 2023). When the same demographic perspective repeatedly controls casting, narrative voice, and aesthetic approval, the field of what is considered relatable or premium narrows, and other ways of representing women get treated as deviations that need a defense. But the reality is, that Women influence 70-80% of consumer spending (NielsenIQ, 2024). Yet 91% of women say brands do not understand them (CreativeX, 2025).

From a SHE SOUNDS. lens, this is a structure issue before it is a taste issue. Brands rarely lack taste, but taste without direction turns into drift, and drift turns into defaults. A brand can post the most inclusive carousel and still sound patriarchal because sound carries authority cues, voice carries hierarchy cues, and music carries desire cues.

Yes, female creative leadership can reshape advertising culture, but only under real conditions

Female creative leadership can significantly shift advertising culture. But only when women have real power, safety, and critical mass, because tokenism does not transform culture. It exhausts people and produces optics.

A 2023 analysis of 839 Spanish campaigns found that when at least one woman holds a creative management role in large agency networks, the number of women in junior creative roles roughly doubles compared with all-male leadership teams (Roca, Suarez, & Melendez-Rodriguez, 2023). That is consistent with critical mass theory: leadership changes hiring, mentoring, sponsorship, and retention, which changes who gets trained into "what good looks like."

Research suggests female creative leaders often use transformational, democratic leadership styles and actively mentor, sponsor, and reduce gender bias in advancement (Roca et al., 2023; Montes & Roca, 2016). Diverse creative teams are linked to wider creative ranges and more inclusive messages, especially where women control vision, voice and visibility in leadership (Thompson-Whiteside, 2020; Grow, Roca, & Broyles, 2012). Research also links women's under-representation in leadership with advertising's overreliance on narrow, often sexist stereotypes, and cites more women in decision-making as crucial to disrupting those patterns (Thompson-Whiteside et al., 2020; Grow et al., 2012; Middleton, Turnbull, & de Oliveira, 2019).

Female creatives themselves have been clear that empowering women inside agencies, rather than only "empowering" women in campaigns, is necessary for advertising to credibly reflect society (Thompson-Whiteside et al., 2020; Thompson-Whiteside, 2020; Mueller, Dubosar, & Windels, 2022). None of this implies that women automatically produce superior work or that men are incapable of ethical, complex representation. The more precise claim is structural:

When leadership becomes more representative, the creative range expands, and the likelihood of stereotype-driven decision-making decreases.

The research is also honest about the limits. Women leaders often navigate hostile boys-club cultures, motherhood penalties, and pressure to perform masculinity to be taken seriously, which can dilute their ability to shift norms or drive other women's advancement (Thompson-Whiteside et al., 2020; Olsen, 2021; Miliopoulou & Kapareliotis, 2021; Windels & Mallia, 2015). Glass-ceiling data suggests women still sit around roughly 18-35% of creative managers in many markets, below the level needed for deep culture change (Roca et al., 2023; Roca, Chala-Mejia, & Suarez, 2024; Dodd, 2012).

Now bring this back to music and sound. If the female gaze is a shift in authorship and emotional permission, sound is where permission gets loud, intimate, funny, angry, tender, and specific. This is not about women "hearing differently."And yes, there is research that finds sex-linked differences in auditory function and hormone-related variation across the menstrual cycle and around menopause, but that evidence speaks to sensitivity and physiology, not to cultural meaning, taste, or brand resonance (Melynyte et al., 2023). Pushing further down the "female hearing" route is a credibility trap because it risks biological essentialism while offering little insight into what actually shapes meaning: authorship, power, and learned listening.

Case studies: what perspective changes when it holds the pen

Dove, "Campaign for Real Beauty." Developed by Dove/Unilever and sustained through a long-term partnership with Ogilvy, the platform is frequently cited as a category shift in how women are represented in beauty advertising. The point is platform logic: a consistent, defended perspective that made it harder to slide back into category defaults, and that takes leadership that can protect the direction over time.

Beyonce, "Formation." "Formation" is widely analyzed as a work that centers Black female subjectivity and resists objectifying conventions in mainstream visual culture. Morris (2018) argues it "subverts the gaze" by situating Black feminist politics as narrative authority, using sound and image as tools of self-definition and cultural critique. With Beyonce leading the project and Melina Matsoukas directing the video, perspective governs pacing, symbolism, texture, and the emotional register of a cultural moment.

Why this matters for brands, advertising, and contemporary culture

On market grounds, women drive a large share of consumer purchasing decisions across categories (Forbes, 2019). The sharper point is misrecognition: when brands rely on women but do not share authorship power with women, the work can look competent and still fail to connect because it simplifies the audience it depends on.

On cultural grounds, music and advertising do not merely reflect norms, they teach them. Repeated portrayals of women as simplified types become ambient instruction, shaping what audiences expect and what they tolerate. Sound accelerates that instruction because it goes straight to emotion and memory.

On creative grounds, expanding who leads expands what can be shown, felt, and taken seriously. That includes sound palette choices, vocal framing, mix intimacy, pacing, and the emotional temperature you allow to sit at the center of the story. Consistency lives in the feeling, and taste needs structure to stay consistent under pressure.

Conclusion

When women are underrepresented in creative leadership or only wheeled in for the quote, you do not get a female gaze. You get a male default with a diversity caption.

SHE SOUNDS. exists to push that shift forward with taste and structure. We build sound worlds that center FLINTA-led perspective, and we do it rights-led with licensing clarity so the work can live confidently on social, in campaigns, and across film and TV. If you want a sound palette that makes your brand feel unmistakable and actually holds together across formats, reach out. Sound is not background. It is story, memory, and identity. SHE SOUNDS. creates space for nuance, care, and voices that are still too rarely heard. Sound is not background. It is story, memory, and identity. SHE SOUNDS. creates space for nuance, care, and voices that are still too rarely heard. Because when you change who is behind the sound, you change how the world listens.

Disclaimer
This article combines publicly available research, industry reporting, and the author’s professional interpretation. All statistics referenced are time-bound, market-specific, and subject to the methodologies and definitions of their original sources. Representation data varies by geography, timeframe, and dataset.

The argument presented here is structural rather than biological. It does not claim that any gender is inherently more creative, more capable, or produces superior work. Instead, it addresses patterns of authorship, commissioning, and decision-making power within specific industries.

Where research findings are discussed, correlation does not imply causation. This article reflects a perspective on cultural authorship and creative leadership, not a comprehensive industry census or legal claim.

___________________________________________________________________________________

References

Adweek. (2022). With just 1% of ad agencies owned by women... (citing the 4A's).

Annenberg Inclusion Initiative. (2024). Inclusion in the Recording Studio? Gender & race/ethnicity of artists, songwriters, & producers across Billboard Hot 100 Year-End Charts (2012-2023).

Bruce, I. (2025, March 21). Women drive the economy. But are still overlooked in advertising. CreativeX. 

CreativeX. (2025). Gender in advertising 2025 (Report). CreativeX

Dodd, F. (2012). Women leaders in the creative industries: a baseline study. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 4, 153-178.

Forbes. (2019). 20 facts and figures to know when marketing to women.

Grow, J., Roca, D., & Broyles, S. (2012). Vanishing acts. International Journal of Advertising, 31, 657-679.

Ipsos & Effie UK. (2023). A Woman's Worth: How better portrayal is good for business.

Middleton, K., Turnbull, S., & de Oliveira, M. (2019). Female role portrayals in Brazilian advertising: are outdated cultural stereotypes preventing change?. International Journal of Advertising, 39, 679-698.

Miliopoulou, G., & Kapareliotis, I. (2021). The toll of success: Female leaders in the "women-friendly" Greek advertising agencies. Gender, Work and Organization.

Montes, C., & Roca, D. (2016). El liderazgo femenino en la creatividad publicitaria.

Morris, M. (2018). Beyonce and the Politics of Black Feminism. Popular Music and Society, 41(2), 123-140.

Mueller, S., Dubosar, E., & Windels, K. (2022). From below the glass ceiling: female perspectives in the world of advertising. Journal of Gender Studies, 33, 45-57.

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative cinema.

NielsenIQ. (2024, April 4). Shaping success: A deep dive into women’s impact on the CPG landscape. NielsenIQ

Olsen, K. (2021). Where's the beef: how one woman navigated advertising's male-dominated creative world. Feminist Media Studies, 22, 1067-1082.

Roca, D., Suarez, A., & Melendez-Rodriguez, S. (2023). Female creative managers as drivers for gender diversity in advertising creative departments: a critical mass approach. Gender in Management: An International Journal.

Roca, D., Chala-Mejia, P., & Suarez, A. (2024). The glass ceiling effect in Spanish advertising creative departments. Communication & Society.

The One Club. (2022). Press release citing The 3% Movement: women creative directors increased from 3% to 29%.

The 3% Movement. (2023). Reporting on women in creative leadership (industry tracking).

Thompson-Whiteside, H. (2020). Something in Adland doesn't add up: It's time to make female creatives count. Business Horizons, 63, 597-606.

Thompson-Whiteside, H., Turnbull, S., & Howe-Walsh, L. (2020). Advertising: should creative women be expected to "fake it"?. Journal of Marketing Management, 37, 294-319.

UN Women / Unstereotype Alliance. (2024). New research: inclusive advertising boosts sales and brand value.

Windels, K., & Mallia, K. (2015). How being female impacts learning and career growth in advertising creative departments. Employee Relations, 37, 122-140.

Melynyte, A. L. M., et al. (2023). Sex differences and the effect of female sex hormones on auditory function: A systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.